News Stories

Sponsored by Earth Etch. Regulatory insight and compliance solutions for today’s energy markets.

Broker/Consultant Rulemaking

By: MAGNIFYI Staff

Published September 4, 2024

Category: Uncategorized

The PSC was required by the Supreme Court for the County of Albany to show cause why the Court should not issue a stay of the relevant ordering clauses of the PSC’s retail energy broker regulation order and why the Court should not preliminarily enjoin the PSC from enforcing such clauses. The PSC was also ordered to show cause why the PSC’s broker regulation order should not be declared void under various arguments from appellants, including the allegation that the order exceeds the PSC’s authority, and the allegation that the broker regulation order is in violation of lawful procedure, is affected by errors of law, and/or is arbitrary and capricious. Hearing was scheduled for August 30, 2024. Stay tuned!

See Albany Supreme Court Index No. 907244-24.
See also:  Matter No. 23-00117 and  98-M-1343

Copyright 2026 MAGNIFYI.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of MAGNIFYI.com without the separate and express written consent of MAGNIFYI.com.

Editor’s Picks

FCC Reassigned Numbers
New Hampshire NH DOE Files Proposed Interconnection of DER Rules
Massachusetts Update:  Massive MA Legislation Passes Crucial House Vote by Adopting all Amendments and Now Moves to Final Vote in Senate
TCPA Court of Appeals Concludes Written Consent Not Needed for Telemarketing Calls?
PJM PJM’s Proposes Behind-the-meter Generation Rules

Trending

TCPA Court of Appeals Concludes Written Consent Not Needed for Telemarketing Calls?
Compliance Considering Outsourcing Key Marketing or Sales Functions?
PJM PJM’s Proposes Behind-the-meter Generation Rules
Data Centers Data Centers Support Grid But Unexpected Trips Could Hurt
Texas Marketing Metrics – It’s More Than Just Sales