News Stories
Sponsored by Earth Etch. Regulatory insight and compliance solutions for today’s energy markets.
Another TCPA Retail Energy Case to Follow
Court Grants in Part and Denies in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery in Indra Energy’s TCPA Do-Not-Call Class Action Case
In Robert Nock v. PalmCo Administration, LLC d/b/a Indra Energy, et al., Case No.: 1:24-cv-00662-JMC, 2026 WL 353117 (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2026), the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses in a TCPA and Maryland Telephone Solicitation Act case.
Indra Energy successfully defeats a majority of Plaintiff’s motion to compel but will be ordered to comply with some of the Plaintiff’s demandsAmong other things, Plaintiff sought request for Production No. 9: “[a]ll documents concerning Indra’s “Do-Not-Call policy during the class period, including (but not limited to) all copies and/or versions of any Do-Not-Call list (including both National Do-Not-Call lists and internal Do-Not-Call lists), including all requests to be placed on any Do-Not-Call list, all documents sufficient to determine when particular telephone numbers were added to such Do-Not-Call lists, documents sufficient to identify all parties responsible for adding such telephone numbers to such Do-Not-Call list”.
Indra objected on the basis that the request was vague, ambiguous and overly broad.
Ultimately Indra Energy was able to defeat majority of Plaintiff’s motion to compel but will be ordered to comply with some of the demands. Stay tuned!
