News Stories

Sponsored by Earth Etch. Regulatory insight and compliance solutions for today’s energy markets.

Pogo Energy To Pay $100,000 Settlement With PUC Staff For Excessive Rates

Category: Uncategorized

Pogo Energy, LLC (Pogo) would pay $100,000 under a settlement with the Staff of the Public Utility Commission of Texas to resolve Pogo’s alleged violation of 16 TAC § 25.498, related to pricing of a prepaid product.

Under 16 TAC § 25.498(c)(15), a REP that provides prepaid service to a residential customer must not charge an amount for electric service that is higher than the price charged by the provider of last resort (POLR) in the applicable transmission and distribution utility (TDU) service territory.

Excerpts from the settlement:
{***} From January 1, 2023, to May 31, 2023, Pogo charged 35,047 customers more for electric service than what would have been charged under the applicable POLR rate each month.

Pogo issued credits each month as part of its POLR ‘true-up’ process, resulting in a total of $1,156,992 of bill credits issued to customers over a 5-month period.

Pogo asserts that its monthly POLR true-up process ensures that a prepay customer would not pay more on a monthly basis than the customer would have been charged under the applicable monthly POLR rate. {***}

From January 1, 2023, to May 31, 2023, the prices listed on Pogo’s prepaid EFLs for one or more usage levels was higher than the price listed for the same usage level on the corresponding POLR EFL 58 times.

By listing a price on Pogo’s EFL which was higher than the price listed for the same usage level on the corresponding POLR EFL, Pogo violated 16 TAC § 25.498(c)(15).

Pogo has ceased the billing practices central to Staff’s alleged violation of 16 TAC § 25.498(c)(15).

Pogo has implemented the following corrective measures to prevent violations of 16 TAC §25.498(c)(15) from occurring, and will maintain such measures going forward:

  1. Pogo has ceased billing energy rates that are higher than the POLR energy rate thus eliminating the monthly POLR true-up process.
  2. Pogo has taken steps to ensure its EFLs disclose a price equal to or lower that [sic] the maximum POLR rate for the applicable usage levels as shown on the POLR EFL.

Commission Staff alleges that regardless of the true-up progress, Pogo violated 16 TAC § 25.498(c)(15) by charging an energy rate that was higher than the posted POLR EFL energy rate amount for prepaid service than the applicable POLR rate.

16 TAC § 25.498(c)€(15) also states that the price for prepaid service to a residential customer calculated in accordance with 16 TAC § 25.475(g)(2)(A(E) must be equal to or lower than the maximum POLR rate for the residential customer class at the 500 kilowatt-hour (kWh), 1,000 kWh, and 2,000 kWh usage levels as shown on the POLR electricity facts label (EFL) posted on the Commission’s website for the applicable TDU service territory.

Settlement Agreement And Report To The Commission  (03/20/2024)
56337  (03/11/2024)