News Stories

Sponsored by Earth Etch. Regulatory insight and compliance solutions for today’s energy markets.

Parties File Comments In DRIVE Act Implementation

By: MAGNIFYI Staff

Published August 27, 2025

Dockets: 9761
Category: Maryland
Related Categories: DRIVE Act Implementation, Electric

Comments were filed by Alliance for Transportation Electrification (ATE), Edison Electric Institute and Virtual Peaker.  

All comments can be viewed here. 

9761 (07/11/2024)
(DRIVE Act Implementation)

Copyright 2026 MAGNIFYI.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of MAGNIFYI.com without the separate and express written consent of MAGNIFYI.com.

Editor’s Picks

Transaction Management The Value of Keeping Transaction Data Separate from Billing
Virginia Reminder – State Enacts First of Its Kind Electricity Consumption Tax on Data CentersBut Stops Short of Repealing Data Center Sales Tax Exemption
Pennsylvania State Reps. Urge PUC to Reject Proposed Decision Approving Utility’s Default Service Plan Because of Anti-Choice Provisions
Market Share Analysis Small Suppliers Are Winning Share in Texas
PJM FERC Tells PJM To Refile With Large Load Capacity Plans by November 11

Trending

Market Share Analysis Small Suppliers Are Winning Share in Texas
Texas PUC Amends REP Letter of Credit Requirements
Connecticut Monthly Switching Stats Indicate Only 18.2% of Customers are Served by Electric Suppliers
Ohio Host of Parties File Reply Comments in Utility’s Proposed Stand-Alone Data Center Tariff
Pennsylvania State Reps. Urge PUC to Reject Proposed Decision Approving Utility’s Default Service Plan Because of Anti-Choice Provisions